The Bigger Picture 4 Comments Credit: What do all of these men have in common? In my eyes, they deserve to die. These men deserve the death penalty.
Pro Definition of Capital Punishment: Capital punishment is the death sentence awarded for capital offences like crimes involving planned murder, multiple murders, repeated crimes, rape and murder etc where in the criminal provisions consider such persons as a gross danger to the existence of the society and provide death punishment.
Capital Punishment is a moral and just punishment in the cases mentioned in the above definition.
I would also argue that the current method of execution is vastly inefficient and costly. This belief is rooted in our very laws governing murder. Now the logic follows that when one person violates that right, they should be punished. Said person also loses his rights upon showing his negligence for the victims.
It is completely reasonable to draw upon these facts the conclusion that someone who shows such disregard for human life shall face the same punishment. To do otherwise would be immoral, given the said violator showed clear understanding of his actions and intent for the crime.
The punishment offers a large amount of comfort to friends and relatives of the victim. Capital Punishment also functions as a deterrent in society against violent crimes.
This can be shown by the very low figures in violent crime rates among countries that almost always carry out on the death penalty, such as Singapore.
In crimes where the violators have a large amount of fore thought before the action, capital punishment acts as a great deterrent. Keeping inmates alive is extremely costly and we spend huge amounts of money each year on convicts in prison for life.
Swift and efficient executions could drastically reduce these expenditures. I eagerly await a response. Con Cody Franklin, Resident Fascist.
Pleased to meet you, Pro. Now then, on to the good stuff! Morality I will agree, for the sake of this debate, that humans have a "right" to life, though my personal beliefs may state otherwise. The death penalty takes away the opportunity for the criminal to confront the harms of the crime committed.
Instead of allowing room for contrition, repentance, and redemption, our justice system tosses such criminals to the side for the sake of convenience, branding them quickly as being beyond hope. The purpose of the justice system is not to punish, but to correct, and to rehabilitate.
The death penalty in no way helps to meet this goal. While Pro may argue that some criminals simply cannot be rehabilitated, that is not an adequate justification for condemning some to death who may have had the capacity to repent of their crimes.The board emphasized that rehabilitation is a meaningful goal in our penal system and that continued vengeance needs to be tempered with justice and mercy.
Otherwise parole becomes a meaningless.
Although there are different concepts of what constitutes just punishment, anytime the well-being of the criminal out ways that of the victim, justice has not been served.
To gauge justice, one should ask themselves. proper punishment or fair treatment is given by the legal system Many people do not believe that justice has been served/done in his case.
Theories of retributive justice are concerned with punishment for wrongdoing.
Restorative justice (also sometimes called "reparative justice") is an approach to justice that focuses on restoring what is good, and necessarily focuses on the needs of victims and offenders. Harmony. Justice by. The punishment offers vengeance to friends and relatives of the victim.
While providing for the victim's loved ones is an important function of the justice system, satisfying their lust for revenge is certainly not a priority in our courts. Each also appeals to our commitment to"justice": Is justice to be served at all costs?
Or is our commitment to justice to be one tempered by our commitment to equality and our reverence for life?
Indeed, is capital punishment our duty or our doom?